Home / Dining tables and chairs
Dining table and chair verification
Dining furniture fails verification in ways that do not show up on a delivery note. Solid wood is quietly downgraded to cheaper species, legs loosen at the joint, and a batch sprayed in two shifts arrives in two shades. We check the wood against your sample, the joints against their fixings, and the colour across the batch rather than unit by unit.
Six ways a dining order goes wrong
<strong>Solid wood quietly becomes cheaper species</strong> — rubber wood sold as ash, eucalyptus sold as teak. End grain and density differ; the invoice does not.
<strong>Legs loosen at the joint</strong> — a dowel where a corner block and bolt were specified. Fine on day one, wobbly after three months of daily use.
<strong>Colour varies across the batch</strong> — the spray line changes shift and the mix is re-adjusted. Two batches in one container; grey-scale difference of 3 where 4 is required.
<strong>The table is undersized</strong> — 1750 mm delivered against 1800 mm ordered. Two chairs either side, and the room no longer works.
<strong>Seat height wrong for the market</strong> — 420 mm shipped to a market that needs 460 mm for its table height. Nothing is wrong with the chair; it is wrong for the buyer.
<strong>Extension hardware missing</strong> — the leaf and the mechanism are in the carton count but not in the carton. Discovered after delivery.
Verification scope by level
What we check for this category at each level. Every row is a real difference in on-site work — not a shorter version of the same report.
| Check | Level 1 $149 |
Level 2 $199 |
Level 3 $299 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Model and SKU against your PI | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mixed table-and-chair order: counted per model | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Carton count and marks | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Colour and model mix ratio | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Wood species vs your sample (end grain, density, odour) | — | ✓ | ✓ |
| Species documentation requested from factory | — | ✓ | ✓ |
| Moisture content meter reading | — | ✓ | ✓ |
| Overall dimensions measured | — | ✓ | ✓ |
| Functional dimensions (seat height, table height) | — | ✓ | ✓ |
| Extension leaf in both positions | — | ✓ | ✓ |
| Diagonal squareness on tables | — | ✓ | ✓ |
| Seat load to your specified figure | — | ✓ | ✓ |
| Leg strength 75 lbs, four directions | — | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rearward stability tested separately | — | ✓ | ✓ |
| Wobble on level floor | — | ✓ | ✓ |
| Corner blocks and leg fixings present | — | ✓ | ✓ |
| Appearance vs your approved sample | — | ✓ | ✓ |
| Finish and surface defects | — | ✓ | ✓ |
| Colour across the batch (front / middle / rear) | — | ✓ | ✓ |
| Grey-scale comparison photographed together | — | — | ✓ |
| Coating adhesion by cross-hatch | — | — | ✓ |
| Accessory and hardware pack completeness | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Carton drop test | — | ✓ | ✓ |
| Core sampling recommended where species doubt remains | — | ✓ | ✓ |
| Third-party species report verification | — | — | ✓ |
| Loading supervision on request | — | — | ✓ |
See the full level comparison across all categories →
What we verify against your documents
Judgement is made against your PI, your agreed specification and your approved sample — never against a generic standard. Bring those documents and the check is meaningful; without them, the report records which judgements rest on incomplete reference.
| Item | Checked against | How |
|---|---|---|
| Model and SKU ★ | Your PI | Model code on every unit and carton matched against your PI |
| Unit count per model ★ | Your PI and packing list | Counted per model — a mixed table-and-chair order is verified model by model, not as a single total |
| Wood species against sample ★ | Your specification and approved sample | End grain, density and odour compared against your sample and any species documentation the factory provides. Visual identification is indicative — where doubt remains we recommend core sampling |
| Moisture content ★ | Your specification | Meter reading on every sampled unit. Hardwood above 10% or softwood above 12% is a finding — this is what causes splitting in the buyer’s climate |
| Overall dimensions ★ | Your PI or drawing | Length, width, height measured against your stated figure with a tape, including the extension leaf in both positions |
| Functional dimensions | Your PI | Seat height, seat depth, table height to top and to underside of apron — checked against the market they are going to |
| Seat load ★ | Your specification or contract standard | Static load on the seat to your specified figure with calibrated weights (residential 300 lbs / 30 min; BIFMA 225 lbs functional; EN 1300 N) |
| Leg strength ★ | Your specification or contract standard | 75 lbs applied at the leg, four directions, on every sampled chair. For contract orders we use your specified figure |
| Stability ★ | Your specification | Forward and rearward tilt. Rearward is the more demanding test and the more common failure on dining chairs — it is checked separately |
| Joint and fixings ★ | Your specification | Corner blocks, bolts and dowels present and correctly sized. Visible mechanical fixings required for contract orders |
| Wobble on level floor | — | Every sampled chair rocked on a level floor. Diagonal squareness measured on tables |
| Colour across the batch | Your approved sample | Units sampled from different positions in the stack and compared under daylight and raking light — batch consistency, not unit-by-unit |
| Surface and finish | Your approved sample | Scratches, sanding marks, lacquer runs, uneven sheen, open grain, chipped edges |
| Carton marks and labels ★ | Your packing list | Carton count, shipping marks, order numbers, model identification per carton |
| Accessory and hardware pack | Your packing list | Extension leaf, mechanism, fixings and assembly hardware counted against the list |
| Carton drop test | — | Two cartons dropped per shipment on the corner and edge specified for the weight |
★ = mismatch means the goods do not match the order, not merely a quality complaint.
Materials — what you agreed against what we look for
The specification you negotiated should state the species, not just “solid wood”. This is the table below.
| Item | What you agreed | What we check on site |
|---|---|---|
If the order is residential rather than contract
The same chair sold into a restaurant or a hotel project is held to a different standard, and a chair that passes one can fail the other.
| Residential | Commercial / contract | |
|---|---|---|
| Seat static load | 300 lbs / 30 minutes | 1,020 N (225 lbs) BIFMA functional, or 1,300 N EN 12520 |
| Leg strength | 75 lbs four directions | 100 kg four directions |
| Stability | Rearward tilt checked | Rearward 45 lbs / forward 21 lbs (BIFMA X5.1) |
| Joint fixings | Dowels or bolts as specified | Visible mechanical fixings required |
| Colour difference | Grey scale 4 | Grey scale 5 or ΔE ≤1.0 |
| Stacking (if required) | Not required | Ten stacked for one hour plus 50 cycles |
Where a specified load exceeds what our on-site weights can reach — 1,500 N is roughly 153 kg — the report states the figure actually tested. We do not claim a test we did not perform.
Outside our scope
We verify against your documents. We are not a laboratory.
| Item | Why it is outside our scope |
|---|---|
Level 3 verifies documents; it does not replace them. Where your order needs accredited testing — fire resistance, formaldehyde emission, Martindale abrasion, salt spray — a CMA/CNAS laboratory is the only route. We are not accredited and cannot issue those reports. We can introduce you, and the fee goes to the laboratory directly.
Our report is an order verification statement. It has no legal standing and cannot be used for customs clearance, marketplace approval or litigation.
Colour batches — why single-unit inspection misses them
<strong>What we do:</strong> sample units from the front, middle and rear of each stack, compare them side by side under daylight and again under raking light, and record the grey-scale reading. We photograph the samples together in one frame so the comparison is visible in the report.
<strong>What a per-unit check misses:</strong> every chair can match the approved sample on its own and still arrive in two shades. The failure is in the batch, not the unit, so it has to be checked across the batch.
<strong>What we recommend:</strong> if your order is large enough for the spray line to have changed shift mid-production, tell us at booking. We will sample more positions and photograph the comparison across the whole consignment.
How we sample
ISO 2859-1 / ANSI ASQC Z1.4 general inspection level II, single sampling, normal inspection. Each defect class is counted separately against its own AQL.
Open the full AQL calculator →
What we photograph on every dining verification
What we find most often on dining orders
- <strong>Rubber wood sold as ash</strong> — end grain and density clearly different; this is the single most common substitution in solid wood dining furniture
- <strong>Dowel-only leg joints</strong> — no corner block where the specification called for one
- <strong>Two colour batches in one shipment</strong> — grey-scale 3 against a required 4
- <strong>Table 50 mm undersized</strong> — within nothing; simply not the dimension ordered
- <strong>Seat height wrong for the destination market</strong> — quality is fine, specification for that country is not
- <strong>Extension leaf missing from the carton count</strong> — cartons present, contents incomplete
Each finding is recorded with a photograph, a location reference, and the document it was judged against.
What we need from you
Required for a meaningful check
- Your PI or PO — models, quantities, colours, dimensions
- Your agreed specification — materials and tolerances
- Your approved sample — physical or photographed
- Packing list — carton count and packing method
Helpful but not essential
- Technical drawings or dimension sheets
- Carton mark artwork
- Previous verification reports, if re-checking
- Known issues from earlier shipments
- Your client's specific requirements, if any
If you only have a product link, send that. We will build the check criteria for you and tell you what we will look at, before we arrive. That scoping conversation is free.
From $149 per man-day · All-inclusive travel in Guangdong · Report within 24 hours
Questions about dining furniture verification
1. How do you confirm the wood species without a laboratory?
We compare end grain pattern, density and odour against your sample, and we ask the factory for species documentation. Visual identification is indicative, not conclusive. If doubt remains we tell you so and recommend core sampling — that is the honest answer, not a clean tick.
2. What is the most common wood substitution you see?
Rubber wood sold as ash. It is similar in colour after finishing and far cheaper. The end grain is more open and the density is lower, which is how we catch it. Where a buyer has been told teak and receives eucalyptus, that is the same problem at the premium end.
3. Do you check every chair or a sample?
A statistically valid sample under ISO 2859-1 general level II. On a 500-piece order that is 80 units. Level 2 increases the sample, Level 3 approaches full inspection. The report states the lot size, sample size and accept/reject numbers.
4. Why do you test rearward stability separately?
Rearward is the more demanding direction and the more common failure on dining chairs — the back leg lifts first under a person leaning back. Most casual checks only push forward. BIFMA X5.1 specifies 45 lbs rearward against 21 lbs forward.
5. Can you check the colour before shipment?
Yes, and this is one of the more useful things we do. We sample from different positions in the stack and compare them together, because the failure is in the batch rather than in any single chair.
6. What if my order is restaurant or hotel contract furniture?
Then the standard is higher and we test to it — BIFMA or EN figures, visible mechanical fixings, grey scale 5. Tell us at booking that it is a contract order so we test to the right level rather than the residential one.